Examiner Gender Bias in a National Licensure Examination

Table of Contents

1. Examiner Gender Bias in a National Licensure Examination
2. Introduction
3. Research Questions
4. Methodology
5. Candidate Sample Size
6. Examiner Sample Size
7. Exam Scores
8. 1996 Women Candidates Scored Higher on 10 Station Subscores
9. 1996 Stations With More Than 2 Male Examiners
10. 1996 Main Effect for Candidate Gender
11. 1996 Main Effect for Examiner Gender
12. 1996 Borderline Candidates Analysis
13. 1996 Borderline Candidates: Main Effect for Examiner Gender
14. Summary of 1996
15. 1997 Women Candidates Score Higher in 6 Subscores, Men in 3
16. 1997 Stations With More Than 2 Male Examiners
17. 1997 Main Effect for Candidate Gender
18. 1997 Main Effect for Examiner Gender
19. 1997 Subscore with Examiner-gender/Candidate-gender Interaction
20. 1997 Borderline Candidates: Women Candidates Score Higher 7 Times, Men 4 Times
21. 1997 Borderline Candidates: Main Effect for Candidate Gender
22. 1997 Borderline Candidates: Main Effect for Examiner Gender
23. Summary of 1997
24. Conclusions
25. Discussion
26. Limitations
27. Where Does This Leave Us?
28. Future Research Possibilities

Copyright © 2006 Canadian Alliance of Physiotherapy Regulators | Privacy Policy | Site Map
This site contains PDF (Portable Document Format) documents which require the use of the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.